The month-end close that took nine days
Three systems that didn't talk to each other and a manual reconciliation every month. We built the missing layer between the ERP and day-to-day operations.
0
less time to close
0
to production
0
to close today
No templates bent to fit. We design the system around the way you really work and stay with you until it's live and running in production.
No long forms, no sales call first. You choose, we respond.
Answer three questions and we'll put your plan together: the phases, how long each one takes and what you get at the end. Then, in a free diagnostic session, we dig into your case and send you a fixed-scope proposal in writing. And if funding is what's holding you back, there's a path for that too.
Pick whatever sounds most like your situation. It doesn't have to be exact.
This tells us how much discovery work is needed before we build.
With a hard deadline, we change the order: what delivers value goes first, the rest comes after. And if the constraint isn't time but budget, say so: there's a plan for that.
Your plan is already written into the message: just add your name, your company and a time that works for you. Someone from our technical team replies within one business day to confirm the meeting.
Drag the slider to see the difference. Same team, same day, same workload.
Five stages. At each one, you know what you'll get and when. If something isn't going to work, we tell you at stage one, not stage four.
We sit down with the people who do the work, not just the people who manage it. We map the process as it is today —shortcuts, exceptions and all— and define what would have to change to make it worthwhile.
A clickable prototype of the key screens, a defined architecture and a fixed budget in writing. You try it out before a single line of production code exists.
Every two weeks you see something that works, not a status report. We start with the module your team uses every day, so the value shows up before the project is finished.
Data migration, team training and hands-on support through the first real weeks. A system nobody uses is a failed project, no matter how clean the code is.
Monitoring, improvements and new features based on what the usage data shows. And if you'd rather your team take the controls, we get them ready for that: that's a successful outcome too.
Three projects, three different problems. The numbers are measured against how things ran before, not estimated.
Three systems that didn't talk to each other and a manual reconciliation every month. We built the missing layer between the ERP and day-to-day operations.
A legacy platform that couldn't handle peak traffic. We rebuilt it piece by piece, without shutting down operations for a single day.
A founder who knew the problem inside out, with no tech team. We built the minimum viable product and took it to market.
Client names are shared in conversation, with their permission. Here we describe the challenge and the outcome without naming them.
These aren't values on a wall. They're the rules we use to decide what to build and what not to, on every project.
We use cutting-edge technology when it solves something concrete. We test it, measure it and take it to production — we don't add it to the proposal just to look modern.
The software is designed around your process, not the other way around. You'll never have to change how your team works just to make the tool work.
Every feature answers a real person's need: the one who uses it, the one who runs it, the one who decides. If it doesn't help anyone, we don't build it.
We don't deliver and disappear. We support adoption and leave your team able to run it, with or without us.
We choose based on the problem, the team that will maintain it and the project's time horizon. If your team already knows something well, we start there.
Your team can read it and maintain it. Exotic technology becomes technical debt the day we leave.
It has a community and support for the next ten years. We don't build on things that might disappear.
Running costs are predictable. An elegant architecture with an unpredictable bill isn't elegant.
We'd rather not give you an off-the-shelf number, because your project isn't off the shelf. It depends on how much process we need to understand, how many integrations are involved and how critical the system is. That's why we start with a free 60-minute diagnostic session: we get to know your case and send you a fixed proposal in writing, before you commit to anything. And if funding is what's holding you back, the conversation doesn't end there: ask us about the Constellation Plan.
A clickable prototype by week 4, and the first module in production somewhere between weeks 8 and 14, depending on size. From then on, releases every two weeks. You'll never wait months to see a screen.
Yes, from the first commit, and in your repository, not ours. The documentation, diagrams and infrastructure access are yours too. If you decide tomorrow to move on with another team, there's nothing to claim and nothing to migrate. The only exception is the Constellation Plan, where the product belongs to StelarSoft: you know that and sign off on it before we start — it never comes up as a surprise later.
The scope is locked in writing before we build, and billing happens by phase. If something new comes up along the way, it's quoted separately and you decide whether it goes in now or later. There's no surprise invoice at the end.
Probably, yes. Many of the companies that reach out to us know their problem inside out but don't have the capital to fund a full build, and that doesn't rule them out. That's what the Constellation Plan is for: if other companies in your industry share the same pain, we build it once, no single company carries the cost of development, and StelarSoft owns the product so it can offer it to the others. Build your plan above, choose “I don't have that kind of capital” and book the session: that's where we'll work out the terms for your case together.
Exclusivity, not the solution. The system goes live solving your problem and you use it without limits; your data is yours, and you can take it with you anytime. What you don't have is the right to stop other companies from using the same product. If you later want that exclusivity or the code, it's possible — and the terms are set in the first contract, not negotiated once you already depend on the system.
They could, and we'd rather tell you up front than have you find out on your own. Three things make up for it: you start with a six-month head start as the only company using it while it's polished, the configuration and data you run on are yours and never go to anyone else, and every company that joins afterward makes the product stronger. But if in your case the tool itself IS your competitive advantage, don't take this plan: what you need then is the standard path, with exclusivity and the code in your name.
That's how we prefer to work. We work in your repositories, follow your standards and do cross code reviews. Our stated goal is for your team to finish the project knowing how to run it without us.
Almost always, yes. We start with an audit of the code and the data, and tell you, based on evidence, what can be salvaged and what's better replaced. Salvaging is usually cheaper than starting from scratch — but we only say so after we've looked.
Yes. We sign NDAs, work within the data-protection rules that apply to you — GDPR, LGPD or your local law — and can run on the infrastructure your organization requires, including on-premises.
We'll tell you, and we won't charge for that conversation. It's happened: sometimes the problem is solved by streamlining a process or properly configuring something you already have. We'd rather lose a project than sell you one you don't need.
The first conversation is a diagnosis, not a sales pitch. You walk away with an honest technical opinion — even if that opinion is that you don't need to build anything yet.